California Congressman Mark Takano Introduces 32-Hour Workweek Bill
On July 27 Repp. Mark Takano of California introduced lawmaking that would cut down the standard workweek from 40 to 32 hours. That means that non-exempt employees would start to encounter overtime after 32 hours, not 40. If passed, it would represent a massive change in the relationship between labor and capital in the United States, unrivalled that the evidence shows could gain everyone.
Workers across the world, particularly in America, are working longer hours than ever without increased productivity. The four-day workweek is touted as a way to reestablish the unsound-severed kinship between productivity and working hours, handsome working people more clip to animate their lives (and parents more time to take give care of their kids) without reduction what they accomplish on the time.
In a bid release, Takano wrote that "A shorter workweek would benefit some employers and employees like," citing the positive results seen in various experiments with and studies of the concept.
Virtually recently, Iceland piloted a shorter play week and found it to be a reverberating success for its workers. Workers who had a 32-hour workweek were happier, healthier, more productive or American Samoa productive, much motivated, and less emphatic. Since its spillage, 90 percent of working Icelanders have reduced their hours with cracking winner.
The Icelandic experiment suggests that the benefits of the 32-hour workweek exist crosswise industries and are felt by workers, their kids, and families free. That's wherefore it's garnered endorsements from the UK Labour Company, the country of Spain, Unilever, Kickstarter, Microsoft Nihon, and other major companies. Put simply: in that location's a growing consensus across political entity borders and inside the public and private sectors, that working less is corking for parents, workers, and businesses.
Takano cited this evidence, pointing out that in places that utilized the 32-hour workweek, "productivity climbed and workers reported better work-life symmetry, less indigence to take sick days, heightened morale and get down child care expenses because they had more time with their kinsperson and children." He also drew attention to small health deal premiums, lower operating costs for employers, and much limited environmental impact as other benefits of shorter workweeks.
Aside from these practical benefits, there's also an argument to be made for the 32-hour workweek as a thing of fairness.
"People continue to work longer hours spell their yield remains stagnant. We cannot continue to accept this arsenic our reality," Takano said. He also far-famed that the pandemic, which left-wing millions of American laid-off or part-time, showed him that a shorter workweek is needed in order to "earmark more people to take part in the labor market at better reward."
The prospects for the charge aren't exactly sunny—it's a dramatic change that would regard hundreds of millions of multitude and has to make it through the USA Senate, a notoriously slow-to-act general assembly dead body. Only given the preponderance of evidence from countries around the world—and the nascent experiments with a shorter workweek hither in the U.S.—IT's flattering increasingly likely that the four-day workweek is the future of work whether or not its Takano or a future lawmaker who introduces that measure that finally makes it a reality.
https://www.fatherly.com/news/the-united-states-could-finally-get-a-four-day-workweek/
Source: https://www.fatherly.com/news/the-united-states-could-finally-get-a-four-day-workweek/
0 Response to "California Congressman Mark Takano Introduces 32-Hour Workweek Bill"
Post a Comment